Powering Annual Giving with Predictive Analytics

Big Data will reshape Fund Raising landscape, so predicted Stanford Social Innovation Review in a blog. It has been more than a year since that prediction in 2015. Yet there is scant evidence of widespread adoption of Predictive Analytics in fundraising. At the recent Case District I and II Conferences, that we attended, there was little on the agenda about Analytics and Big Data. And there were few signs that non-profit institutions are rushing to embrace the power of Predictive Analytics.

This is a mistake! The barriers to using Predictive Analytics are now very low. Predictive Analytics software has become very inexpensive. Some Open Source tools are even free. Data modeling requires no programming. Sophisticated models can be built with simple drag-n-drop user interface. The statistical science underlying modeling is now widely known. You don’t need a PhD in mathematics. Anyone who has taken some basic college level statistics courses can learn (and even master) analytics in a few months.

By not using Predictive Analytics non-profits are missing out on significant opportunity to improve Fund Raising campaign performance. So how exactly can one use Predictive Analytics to power Annual Giving or Major Gift’s campaigns?

It’s actually not that hard. What Predictive Analytics allows you to do is to figure out, in advance of a campaign, who amongst your constituents, is likely to give and has the capacity to give. Conversely, you can also determine, who is unlikely to give. Armed with this knowledge you can segment your constituent population more intelligently than the traditional RFM (Recency, Frequency, Monetary Value) segmentation. With better segmentation, you can create smarter solicitation plans that focus more on constituents likely to give, and less on those unlikely to give. The result is increased contribution with the same (or lower) marketing spend.

The process for using Predictive Analytics is relatively straight forward.
You start with internal constituent data in your CRM database. You actually need only a handful of attributes that have predictive power. These are attributes such as engagement with institution, age group, family association, and others. Your internal data is then enriched it with external data culled from Social Media, US Census, and other third-party information sources. For example, from Social Media you add online engagement information (e.g. with colleges Facebook page), or their Employment Profile (from LinkedIn) and other such attributes. All that you need is about 15-to-20 data attributes for each constituent.

You then build a model with this data to determine the Propensity and Capacity to Give of the constituents. The model will be different for Non-Donors, Sybunts, and Lybunts. Predictive Models typically assign a score or a probability for the (dependent) variable that is being predicted. For Fund Raising, the dependent variable is either Propensity to Give or Capacity to Give. The higher the score, the greater the likelihood that constituent will give or has the capacity to give. There are vendors and consultants who charge tens of thousands of dollars to assign these scores. The analytics technology and tools are now inexpensive. And this work can be done quite inexpensively.

Once the modeling is done, you can use it to segment intelligently the constituents in your campaign. The easiest way to do so is tag each constituent with a high, medium, and low propensity-to-give descriptor. And similarly tag them with high, medium, and low capacity-to-give descriptor. In effect you are dividing the constituents a third each, along two dimensions – giving-propensity and capacity-to-give. You can divide the constituents in more granular proportion too.

With these descriptive tags in effect you create nine different clusters of constituents. The High-Propensity-to-Give and High-Capacity-To-Give cluster includes the cream of the crop constituents. You want to maximize the marketing spend on this cluster. The Low-Propensity-to-Give and Low-Capacity-to-Give cluster includes constituents that are not going to yield much, even after repeated attempts. So you want to minimize spend on this cluster. In case you feel that the nine clusters are too cumbersome, you can combine the clusters to create bigger segments. So for example, you can combine the High-Propensity-to-Give and High-Capacity-To-Give cluster with Medium-Propensity-to-Give and High-Capacity-To-Give to create a single segment.

The final, and most important step, is to create distinct solicitation plan for each segment. The solicitation plan should include frequency of solicitation, attempt, communication channel mix and sequencing of the use of the different channels. The end result is a campaign strategy that maximizes ROI by reducing wasted solicitation effort and boosting funds raised.

Bootstrap Image Preview

Insight

Insight brings the power of predictive analytics (sometimes called machine learning or data mining) to fundraising.

Bootstrap Image Preview

Acquire

Acquire is a multi-channel, integrated communication platform designed to increase contact rates.

Bootstrap Image Preview

Cultivate

Cultivate improves donor retention with personalized communication that speaks to donor's interests & motivation for giving.

Solutions for Non Profit Sector

SFR-broucher